Pages

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Productivity at Work Place:

Most of the times we hear HR's/manager's complaining about employee's less working hours and more breaks. Lets discuss what’s would be the ideal solution for this common problem across all companies.

Let’s start out with a basic question:

What’s really important for company, rather why companies hire people????
    So that employee comes regularly to office and stay for 9 hours without a break (of course lunch excluded :-) )?????
            (Or)
    So that Employee finishes all the tasks assigned to him with good/excellent quality within the given time.

Obviously the second reason makes more sense, but why does people always complain abt employee's not being compliant with the first reason???

To understand this behavior we need to understand the human perception first, we humans always have a tendency to concentrate on "Negative" things and try to avid doing them in the process our mindset is fixed with all the negative thoughts and how to avoid them. This programs our mind to visualize negative things which make things worse.

Instead why don’t we just concentrate on positive things and try to see that we do all we can to accomplish all those "Positive" things. We can program our mind to visualize our positive accomplishments; this will have huge impact of employee’s morale and in turn increases productivity.

This technique technically referred as "Neuro Linguistic Programming", programming the brains using language of brains.

If we see a employee coming late to the office taking more breaks but he finishes the assigned tasks on time with good quality do we need to bother about his breaks????If still HR's bothers about breaks and they put a policy saying nor breaks or some other new policies this will have huge impact on employee morale and directly impacts his performance and productivity.

Tagline is "Think positive and concentrate on positive things, positive energy flows which can do wonders, Why waste energy on correcting negative things".

No comments:

Post a Comment